parent
ebd34612a2
commit
3e059cc3e9
1 changed files with 1 additions and 8 deletions
@ -1,10 +1,3 @@ |
||||
# Why Red Team AI Systems? |
||||
|
||||
AI systems introduce novel risks beyond traditional software, such as emergent unintended capabilities, complex failure modes, susceptibility to subtle data manipulations, and potential for large-scale misuse (e.g., generating disinformation). AI Red Teaming is necessary because standard testing methods often fail to uncover these unique AI vulnerabilities. It provides critical, adversary-focused insights needed to build genuinely safe, reliable, and secure AI before deployment. |
||||
|
||||
Learn more from the following resources: |
||||
|
||||
@article@What's the Difference Between Traditional Red-Teaming and AI Red-Teaming? - Cranium AI - Compares objectives, techniques, expertise, and attack vectors to highlight why AI needs specialized red teaming. |
||||
@article@What is AI Red Teaming? The Complete Guide - Mindgard - Details specific use cases like identifying bias, ensuring resilience against AI-specific attacks, testing data privacy, and aligning with regulations. |
||||
@article@The Expanding Role of Red Teaming in Defending AI Systems - Protect AI - Explains why the dynamic, adaptive, and often opaque nature of AI necessitates red teaming beyond traditional approaches. |
||||
@article@How red teaming helps safeguard the infrastructure behind AI models - IBM - Focuses on unique AI risks like model IP theft, open-source vulnerabilities, and excessive agency that red teaming addresses. |
Loading…
Reference in new issue