Update 100-code-style.md

Added new must follow guidelines
3 weeks ago · 401fda71db
parent d6b0357ee7
commit 401fda71db
1 changed files with 5 additions and 0 deletions
--- a/src/data/roadmaps/code-review/content/100-code-style.md
+++ b/src/data/roadmaps/code-review/content/100-code-style.md
@ -4,3 +4,8 @@
 - Does it adhere to the agreed-upon naming conventions?
 - Is it DRY?
 - Is the code sufficiently "readable" (method lengths, etc.)?
 - Are comments used appropriately without being excessive?
 - Are functions and methods of appropriate length and focused on a single responsibility?
 - Is complex logic broken into smaller, manageable units?
 - Does the code follow SOLID principles where applicable?
 - Is the overall structure of the code logical and easy to follow?